accuracy rašmandi Fr.: exactitude, précision
For example,
a refrigerator holds a constant temperature of 5.0 °C. A thermometer is used seven times
to read the temperature, with the following results: 6.4, 5.1, 6.3,
4.5, 5.3, 6.1, and 4.1. This distribution
does not well match the actual temperature, therefore it lacks accuracy, and
shows no tendency toward a particular value; it lacks precision, as well. If the measured temperatures are 4.8, 5.3, 5.1, 5.0, 4.6, 5.2, and 5.0,
the mean value is accurate, because it comes close to
the actual temperature, but the distribution shows no clear tendency toward a
particular value (lack of precision). Now suppose that the measured temperatures are 6.2, 6.3, 6.1, 6.0, 6.1, 6.3,
and 6.2. In this case every measurement is well off
from the actual temperature (low accuracy), but the distribution does show a
tendency toward a particular value (high precision). Finally, if the measured temperatures are 5.0, 5.0, 4.8,
5.1, 5.0, 4.9, and 5.0, the distribution is very near the actual
temperature each time (high accuracy), and does show a tendency toward
a particular value (high precision). Accuracy is often given to n → significant digits or
n → decimal places. Etymology (EN): From L. accuratus “prepared with care, exact,” p.p. of accurare “take care of,” from ad- “to” + curare “take care of.” Etymology (PE): Rašmandi, from rašmand, from raš +
adjective forming suffix -mand.
Raš, from Av. root raz- “to right, correct, arrange;” |