syllogism bâhamšomâri (#) Fr.: syllogisme A kind of → deductive reasoning
whereby from two initial → propositions
(two → premises) a third related
proposition (→ conclusion) is derived. The typical
form of a → categorical syllogism is “A is B;”
“C is A;” “Therefore, C is B.” For example, “Mortal” (B) is called the
→ major term; it occurs in the first premise and
is the → predicate of the conclusion.
“John” (C), the subject of the conclusion, is called the
→ minor term. “Human,” which is common to
both premises and is excluded from the conclusion, is called the
→ middle term.
See also → Aristotelian forms.
Syllogism is purely formal. It does not enrich knowledge, but gives a new presentation to what
is already known. It is also possible to have a logically valid syllogism based on
→ absurd premises. For example, “All cats are mammals.”
“All cats are animals.”
“Therefore, all animals are mammals.”
Syllogism, representing the earliest branch of → formal logic,
was developed in its original form by Aristotle in his Organon (Prior Analytics) about
350 BC. → bivalent logic, → polyvalent logic, → symbolic logic, → propositional logic, → first-order logic, → predicate logic, → syllogistic; → fuzzy logic. Etymology (EN): M.E. silogisme, from O.Fr. silogisme, from L. syllogismus, from Gk. syllogismos “a syllogism,” originally “inference, conclusion; computation, calculation,” from syllogizesthai “bring together before the mind, compute, conclude,” from assimilated form of → syn- “together” + logizesthai “to reason, to count,” from logos “a reckoning, reason,” → logic. Etymology (PE): Bâhamšomârik, literally “reckoning together,” from bâham “together,”
from bâ “with,” → hypo-, + ham, |